Human Resource Management and Law:

Facts of the Case: - Mr. Andrew Li, a post-man, while leaving a make in Carlton, was knocked everywhere by a bicycle courier, fool Spice, who did not delineate himself but was wearing a kilobyte jacket with florid lettering which read high-velocity messengers which is the work name of fast-paced couriers Pty Ltd. The company conducts an inner-city courier business. Mr Andrew suffered serious disfiguration to his knee and brought proceedings against Fas runnel Couriers Pty Ltd. Mr Andrews main argument was that speedy Couriers Pty Ltd should be responsible for the negligence of its courier. Mr Andrew argued that an employer is responsible for the acts of his or her employees, when the acts complained of come up in the ordinary course of employment. Based on the training provided, outline the issue(s) and the relevant legal rules which can be employ to solve the issue(s). The issue in a higher trust is whether Mark Spice is an employee of Fastest Couri er Pty Ltd and whether Fastest Courier Pty Ltd is liable to Mr. Andrew on behalf of its courier Mark Spice.

We are despotic to establish employment in this end which can be done by the following different tests under common law: - Personal family test - A personal descent between employer and employee Economic reality test - where employee is economically hooked upon an employer Control test - where employer determines the work to be done by employee Multi - factor test -Factors like the panache of remuneration, the provision and keep of equipment, the obligation to work, the hours of work and provision of holidays, the logical implication of income tax income and the delegation of work by the putative emplo! yee. Who will be the plaintiff in this case? What will be the plaintiffs arguments? `The plaintiff is a Person who initiates legal... If you want to get a bountiful essay, holy order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay